Who Burnt the Bronx? “Decade of Fire” shows how thousands were displaced from 1970s fires

From Independent Lens, the film Decade of Fire covers a shocking but untold piece of American urban history, when the South Bronx was on fire in the 1970s. Left unprotected by the city government, nearly a quarter-million people were displaced as their close-knit, multiethnic neighborhood burned to the ground, reducing the community to rubble.

Metrofocus spoke to Vivian Vázquez Irizarry, the film’s director and producer as well as a survivor of the Bronx fires, and the film’s co-director and producer Gretchen Hildebran.

TRANSCRIPT

>>> IN THE 1970s, THE SOUTH

BRONX WAS LITERALLY ON FIRE.

THE SCALE OF THE DEVASTATION

DURING THAT DECADE IS HARD TO

FATHOM.

40 FIRES A DAY, ACCORDING TO ONE

ESTIMATE.

A CONTINUOUS BLAZE THAT WOULD

END UP DESTROYING 80% OF THE

HOUSING STOCK IN THE AREA,

REDUCING ENTIRE NEIGHBORHOODS TO

RUBBLE.

BUT JUST WHY AND HOW WAS THE

SOUTH BRONX ALLOWED TO BURN TO

THE GROUND?

IT'S A QUESTION THAT STILL

TROUBLES LONG-TIME RESIDENTS AND

THE SUBJECT OF A DOCUMENTARY ON

INDEPENDENT LENS.

"DECADE OF FIRE" FOLLOWS A BRONX

BORN ACTIVIST AS SHE UNCOVERS

THE UNTOLD STORY BEHIND THE

FIRES, REVEALING SHOCKING

NEGLECT AT EVERY LEVEL OF

GOVERNMENT.

HERE IS A PREVENT.

>> I GREW UP IN THE SOUTH BRONX

IN THE 1970s DURING THE TIME OF

THE FIRES.

LANDLORDS WERE BURNING OUR

BUILDINGS FOR PROFIT, AND THEY

DIDN'T HAVE TO REBUILD OUR

HOMES.

A QUARTER MILLION PEOPLE

DISPLACED, RESIDENTS AND

GRASSROOTS ORGANIZATIONS HAD NO

OTHER CHOICE BUT TO FIGHT BACK.

THESE WERE OUR HOMES.

THIS WAS OUR NEIGHBORHOOD.

WE WEREN'T GOING TO TAKE IT

LYING DOWN.

AS PART OF OUR CHASING THE DREAM

INITIATIVE, CODIRECTORS AND

PRODUCERS OF "DECADE OF FIRE,"

VIVIAN VASQUEZ AND GRETCHEN

HILDEBRAN JOIN US NOW.

LADIES, WELCOME TO THE PROGRAM.

>> THANK YOU.

>> THIS WAS SUCH A POWERFUL

DOCUMENTARY.

VIVIAN, I WANT TO START YOU,

BECAUSE THIS IS VERY MUCH YOUR

STORY.

TELL ME HOW DID THIS FILM COME

INTO EXISTENCE?

>> WE -- JULIE ALLEN AND I WHO

IS OUR COPRODUCER WORKED

TOGETHER IN THE BRONX DURING THE

EARLY PART OF THE 2000s.

WE WERE PART OF THE 21st CENTURY

SMALL SCHOOLS MOVEMENT.

WE WERE GOING TO -- WE WERE

WORKING WITH THE CBO -- IN A

CBO, I'M SORRY, WE WERE WORKING

WITHIN A CBO TO START A SMALL

SCHOOL.

WE WANTED TO WRITE A CURRICULUM

FOR BRONX HIGH SCHOOL STUDENTS

SO THEY CAN LEARN ABOUT THEIR

HISTORY IN THE BRONX.

EVENTUALLY THE CURRICULUM WAS

NEVER TAUGHT.

BUT WE JUST KEPT TALKING ABOUT

WHAT HAPPENED IN THE SOUTH BRONX

DURING THE 1970s.

I KEPT TALKING ABOUT MY

EXPERIENCES, HOW I GREW UP, AND

JULIA ENCOURAGED ME TO WRITE

ABOUT IT, AND THEN EVENTUALLY

SHE ENCOURAGED ME TO WORK ON A

FILM.

SHE INTRODUCED ME TO GRETCHEN,

AND THEN WE BEGAN FILMING

FRIENDS AND TELLING OUR STORY

ABOUT HOW WE GREW UP IN THE

SOUTH BRONX AND WHAT THE CONTEXT

WAS OF THE DAY, BECAUSE FOR MANY

OF US, WE HAD A GREAT TIME JUST

LIKE ALL KIDS HAVE A GREAT TIME

DURING THEIR CHILDHOOD.

BUT THERE WAS THIS BACKDROP OF

DEVASTATION AND NEGLECT THAT WAS

EVER SO PRESENT IN OUR MEMORIES.

>> AND GRETCHEN, I JUST WANT TO

SAY THAT WAS SOMETHING THAT I

THINK I FOUND SO ENGROSSING

ABOUT THE FILM IS THAT YOU WERE

ABLE TO GET SO MUCH FOOTAGE THAT

MADE YOU FEEL LIKE YOU WERE

THERE.

HOW WERE YOU ABLE TO PUT

TOGETHER ALL OF THESE PIECES

THAT REALLY IT BROUGHT THE

AUDIENCE INTO THE SPACE THAT --

I MEAN, FOR MYSELF, I DIDN'T

GROW UP IN THE CITY, SO I WASN'T

THERE.

BUT YOU FEEL LIKE IT WATCHING

THIS FILM.

>> RIGHT.

JUST TO MENTION, WHEN WE FIRST

STARTED WORKING ON THIS FILM, IT

WAS 2008.

SO IT WAS A TEN-YEAR PROCESS

THAT WAS, YOU KNOW, WHAT YOU'RE

TALKING ABOUT THAT WAS OUR END

GOAL.

BUT IT DEFINITELY WAS A HUGE

AMOUNT OF WORK.

AND WE WORKED TOGETHER

COLLABORATIVELY.

WHILE I WOULD BE DOING THE

FILMING OR THE EDITING, WE ALSO

TALKED EVERY WEEK ABOUT THE

STORY BECAUSE THERE IS A HUGE

AMOUNT OF AMAZING FOOTAGE.

AND I CAN TELL YOU MORE ABOUT

WHERE WE FOUND THAT, BUT I THINK

PART OF WHAT DRAWS YOU IN IS

THAT WE SPENT SO MUCH TIME

REALLY FOCUSING ON HOW TO LET

THE VIEWER EXPERIENCE THIS STORY

THROUGH VIVIAN'S EYES.

BUZZ SO OFTEN THE BRONX IS

PORTRAYED BY OUTSIDERS AS THIS

OTHER PLACE THAT, YOU KNOW, YOU

WOULDN'T BELIEVE WHAT'S

HAPPENING THERE.

WE REALLY WANTED TO BRING PEOPLE

IN TO THAT EXPERIENCE OF, LIKE,

THE ACTUAL LOVE THAT PEOPLE HAD

FOR THE BRONX AND FOR THEIR

NEIGHBORHOODS THERE, WHICH IS

WHAT ENTICED THEM TO ACTUALLY

STAY AND FIGHT FOR IT WHEN ALL

THIS STUFF WAS GOING ON.

>> SO IN ADDITION TO THE HEART

AND SOUL OF YOUR STORY

SPECIFICALLY, THIS IS ALSO VERY

MUCH A HISTORY LESSON, AND YOU

LEARN A LOT ABOUT, AS I WAS

SAYING IN THE INTRO, THE

FAILURES AT GOVERNMENT AT EVERY

SINGLE LEVEL.

LET'S GO BACK TO ONE OF THE BIG

ISSUES AND THAT WAS THE RED

LINING, THE CREATION OF THE

SOUTH BRONX, IF YOU WILL.

WHY IS IT SO IMPORTANT TO MAKE

PEOPLE UNDERSTAND FIRST OF ALL

WHY THIS NEIGHBORHOOD WAS

INTENTIONALLY CREATED THE WAY IT

WAS.

>> SO RED LINING BEGAN ACTUALLY

IN BROOKLYN, RIGHT, IN THE 19 --

BEGINNING OF THE 1900s.

AND STARVED OFF NEIGHBORHOODS

THAT BANKS OR POLICYMAKERS JUST

WANTED TO KIND OF GET RID OF,

RIGHT.

SO WHEN IT CAME TO THE BRONX, IT

BASICALLY CAME THE WAY THAT I

INTERPRETED IT WAS THIS

NEIGHBORHOOD IS A BAD BET

BECAUSE WE NOW HAVE A GROWING

NUMBER OF AFRICAN AMERICAN AND

PUERTO RICAN PEOPLE LIVING IN

IT, AND THERE IS NO USE IN

SUPPORTING THIS NEIGHBORHOOD.

THESE FOLKS DON'T KNOW HOW TO

TAKE CARE OF THEMSELVES, SO WE

MIGHT AS WELL JUST LEAVE THEM

THERE.

AND SO WHAT THAT MEANT IN

PRACTICAL TERMS WAS THAT FOLKS

WERE NOT PROVIDED WITH ANY

LOANS.

THERE WERE NO RESOURCES TO HELP

BUILD OR RESTORE, MAINTAIN THE

BUILDINGS WHICH WAS REALLY

IMPORTANT.

A LOT OF THE ELECTRICAL WIRING,

THE NEW APPLIANCES THAT WERE

COMING INTO PLAY AT THIS TIME

LIKE HAIR DRYERS AND HEATERS AND

THINGS LIKE THAT, THERE WAS NO

WAY TO GET NEW SERVICES.

SO WHAT RED LINING MEANS IS YOU

DRAW A RED LINE.

>> LITERALLY, YEAH.

>> AND THEN YOU DECIDE NOT TO

PROVIDE, THE GOVERNMENT DECIDES

ALONG WITH PRIVATE ENTITIES

DECIDE THAT THEY'RE NOT GOING TO

PROVIDE ANY ECONOMIC SUPPORT TO

THAT AREA.

AND THAT DEVASTATED THE

COMMUNITY, BECAUSE WE NEEDED

ECONOMIC SUPPORT.

EVERY COMMUNITY NEEDS A LEVEL OF

ECONOMIC, POLITICAL, AND SOCIAL

SUPPORT.

AND WHAT THAT DID WAS THAT IT

JUST, YOU KNOW, ALL THE

BUILDINGS BEGAN TO RUN DOWN, AND

PEOPLE COULDN'T GET OUT, AND

PEOPLE COULDN'T SORT OF

MAINTAIN.

WHEN SOMEONE BUYS A HOME

NOWADAYS, YOU GET A LONE LOAN,

YOU WANT TO FIX IT.

YOU REFINANCE.

YOU DO SOMETHING.

THERE WAS NO ECONOMIC INCENTIVE

TO SUPPORT THE SOUTH BRONX.

>> AND OF COURSE THE FILM ALSO

ADDRESSES THAT THERE WAS NO

ECONOMIC INCENTIVE AT LEAST ON

THE PART OF THE LANDLORD TO

SUPPORT.

HAS IT EVER BEEN PROVEN BEYOND A

SHADOW OF A DOUBT THAT LANDLORDS

WERE INTENTIONALLY BURNING THESE

BUILDINGS, OR IS THAT SOMETHING

THAT'S BEEN MORE COME TO

UNDERSTOOD?

LIKE PEOPLE NOW FEEL THAT'S WHAT

MOST LIKELY HAPPENED.

>> WHAT'S REALLY IMPORTANT TO

KNOW DURING THIS PERIOD IS THE

CITY WAS CUTTING BACKFIRE

SERVICES ACROSS THE CITY.

SO IT WAS CUTTING BACK THE FIRE

DEPARTMENT'S ABILITY TO RESPOND

TO FIRES, AND THEY CUT

DRAMATICALLY THE NUMBER OF FIRE

MARSHALS.

WE TALK ABOUT THIS IN THE FILM.

FIRE MARSHALS ARE THE PEOPLE WHO

SHOW UP TO INVESTIGATE THE

CAUSES OF A SUSPICIOUS FIRE.

AND I THINK THE NUMBERS VARY

OVER TIME, BUT IT WAS WOEFULLY

UNDERSTAFFED.

SO THE VAST MAJORITY OF FIRES,

IF THEY WERE RECORDED AT ALL

BECAUSE MANY FIRES EVER WERE

EVEN RECORDED, WERE NOT

INVESTIGATED.

SO IT'S VERY DIFFICULT TO KNOW

THE CAUSES OF ANY OF THESE FIRES

BECAUSE THEY HAPPENED 40 YEARS

AGO AND NOBODY EVER TOOK DOWN

RECORDS WHAT HAPPENED.

BUT THERE WERE A HANDFUL OF

PROSECUTIONS, AND THERE WAS A

FEDERAL INVESTIGATION BY FEMA,

ACTUALLY INTO THE PRACTICES OF

LANDLORDS AND ALSO THE INSURANCE

COMPANIES AS WELL.

BUT, YOU KNOW, AS WE -- WE FOUND

THIS RESEARCH BY VIVIAN GOES TO

DIFFERENT ARCHIVES AND DIGS IT

UP.

IT IS NOT OUT THERE.

IT'S NOT IN THE PUBLIC MIND THAT

THIS IS SOMETHING THAT WAS A

PRETTY WIDESPREAD PRACTICE BY A

CERTAIN TIME.

BUT ANECDOTALLY, IT WAS

WELL-KNOWN.

>> ACTUALLY, VIVIAN, THAT'S ONE

OF THE SO MANY REASONS THIS FILM

IS IMPORTANT.

IT ADDRESSES THE ISSUE ALSO THAT

A LOT OF PEOPLE IN THE

NEIGHBORHOODS IN THE SOUTH BRONX

INTERNALIZED AND BLAMED

THEMSELVES FOR THE FIRES, AND

THERE IS ALSO ARCHIVAL FOOTAGE

OF CITY OFFICIALS AT THE TIME

SAYING POINT-BLANK THAT IT WAS

THE FAULT OF THE PEOPLE IN THE

SOUTH BRONX.

AND THIS FILM LAYS OUT A CASE

FOR WHY IT'S NOT, AND WHY THE

NEIGHBORHOOD AND THE PEOPLE

SHOULDN'T BE BLAMING THEMSELVES.

WHY WAS THAT SO IMPORTANT?

>> BECAUSE IF YOU LOOK AT THE

CURRENT DAY, YOU WALK AROUND.

AND I WORK IN YOUTH DEVELOPMENT,

RIGHT.

AND WE SEE YOUNG PEOPLE CARRY A

LEGACY THAT DOESN'T BELONG TO

THEM, THAT THEY COME FROM THE

SOUTH BRONX, SO THEY COME FROM

SOME, YOU KNOW, POOR

NEIGHBORHOOD, AND THE NARRATIVE

THAT IS THE CONVENTIONAL WISDOM

IS THAT POOR PEOPLE ARE POOR AND

THEIR NEIGHBORHOODS ARE RUN DOWN

BECAUSE THEY DON'T KNOW HOW TO

TAKE CARE OF THEIR

NEIGHBORHOODS.

THAT'S WHAT WITH OFTEN HEAR.

THAT'S WHAT WE OFTEN HEARD.

WE WERE BLAMED, OH, THE PEOPLE

FROM THE SOUTH BRONX, THEY SET

THE -- OH, IT WAS ARSON, AND THE

PEOPLE IN THE SOUTH BRONX BURNED

THEIR BUILDINGS.

THAT'S WHAT WE OFTEN HEARD.

YOU KNOW, THAT IS A VERY

NEGATIVE AND INTERNAL EMOTION.

THAT'S A MESSAGE THAT KIND OF

MANIFESTS ITSELF IN ANGER OR

FEAR SELF-BLAME OR EVEN LIKE

SELF-ESTEEM, YOU KNOW.

PLENTY OF US KNEW THAT LANDLORDS

WERE BUILDING THEIR BUILDINGS,

BUT WE WERE BLAMED.

I TALK WITH PEOPLE ABOUT THIS

ALL THE TIME WITH PEOPLE IN THE

SOUTH BRONX OR WITH FRIENDS.

ANYWHERE I GO, I SAY I'M FROM

THE SOUTH BRONX, PEOPLE ARE OH,

YOU'RE FROM THE SOUTH BRONX?

DO YOU CARRY A KNIFE?

IS IT SAFE?

THERE IS ALWAYS THAT STIGMA.

AND WE HAVE INTERNALIZED THAT

BECAUSE THAT'S THE MESSAGE WE

CONSTANTLY RECEIVE FROM THE

OUTSIDE WORLD.

AND EVEN WITHIN OURSELVES.

BECAUSE OH, YEAH, WE WERE THE

ONES WHO BURNED IT.

BUT THAT'S NOT THE CASE.

I THINK FOR ME, IT WAS SO

REVELATORY TO UNDERSTAND AND

REVEAL THE FACTORS THAT RED

LINING STARVED AND SAPPED OUR

NEIGHBORHOOD.

WE DIDN'T HAVE A CHANCE.

URBAN RENEWAL, WHITE FLIGHT, THE

IDEA THAT FIREHOUSES WERE CUT AT

A TIME WHEN WE WERE BURNING?

AND THEN WE GOT BLAMED FOR THAT.

BUT WE DIDN'T HAVE THE

PROTECTION WE NEEDED AND YET WE

GOT BLAMED FOR BURNING OUR

NEIGHBORHOODS, THAT IS VERY

IMPACTFUL.

AND I THINK THAT PEOPLE WALK

AROUND THINKING, WELL, I DON'T

LIVE IN A SAFE NEIGHBORHOOD.

I'M FROM THIS PLACE CALLED THE

SOUTH BRONX.

PEOPLE DON'T WANT -- YOU KNOW,

PEOPLE DON'T WANT TO HAVE

ANYTHING TO DO WITH ME OR SEE ME

A CERTAIN QUAY.

SO WE NEEDED TO TELL, AND KIND

OF WHAT WE CALL FLIP THE SWITCH.

>> DEFINITELY THE FILM DOES

THAT.

YOU LAY OUT THE REASONS THERE

SHOULDN'T BE SELF-BLAME, BUT

ALSO THE RESILIENCY OF THE

NEIGHBORHOOD AFTER THE FIRES.

AND HOW PEOPLE CAME TOGETHER AND

DECIDED WELL, IF WE'RE NOT GOING

TO GET HELP, WE'RE GOING TO

REBUILD OUR NEIGHBORS.

>> WE ARE RESPONSIBLE FOR IT.

WE ACTUALLY SAVED THE SOUTH

BRONX.

>> LADIES, I WANT TO THANK YOU

SO MUCH FOR THIS FILM.

THIS IS SUCH A CRUCIAL RETELLING

OF A PIECE OF NEW YORK HISTORY

THAT I THINK PERHAPS HASN'T BEEN

GIVEN THE ATTENTION THAT IT

SHOULD.

SO THANK YOU SO MUCH FOR THIS

FILM.

>> THANK YOU.

>> THANK YOU SO MUCH.

>> FOR MORE INFORMATION ON

"DECADE OF FIRE," VISIT US AT

METROFOCUS.ORG.

>> "METROFOCUS" IS MADE POSSIBLE

BY

JAMES AND MERRYL TISCH,

SUE AND EDGAR WACHENHEIM III,

THE SYLVIA A. AND SIMON B. POYTA

PROGRAMING ENDOWMENT TO FIGHT

ANTI-SEMITISM.

BERNARD AND IRENE SCHWARTZ,

BARBARA HOPE ZUCKERBERG,

AND BY --

You May Also Like